Literature
R. Gajewski. IT in Educational Management: Can it Support Solution of e-Cheating Problem?. Torsten Brinda; Nicholas Mavengere; Ilkka
Haukijärvi; Cathy Lewin; Don Passey. 1st International Conference on Stakeholders and Information Technology in Education (SAITE),
Jul 2016, Guimarães, Portugal. Springer International Publishing, IFIP
Advances in Information and Communication Technology, AICT-493,
pp.104-113, 2016, Stakeholders and Information Technology in Education. (slides)
Abstract: The paper tries to answer the question – can IT tools help to solve e-cheating problem during the course of information technologies and computer sciences. The scale of e-cheating leads to the situation that dishonest students have better grades than honest ones. None of the simple solutions known from the literature helped to solve that problem, so IT tools were used. The first part of the paper gives a critical review of the literature of the subject. In the second one comparative analysis of results of the two surveys is performed. The first one was based on a survey conducted in United States, the second in Australia. This analysis shows that there are very big cultural differences in students’ attitude to cheating in different countries. The third part presents two software solutions of e-cheating problem investigated during research – monitoring software and safe exam browser. Final remarks are accompanied by raising an open question – will these IT solutions be valuable in the coming decade?
K. O. Jones, J. Reid, and R. Bartlett, “E-learning and E-cheating,” presented at the 3rd e-Learning Conference, Coimbra, Portugal, 2008.
Khan, Z. & Samuel, S. D. 2009, 'E-cheating, online sources and technologies: a critical review of existing literature', 9th Global conference of business and economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-15
Khan, Z. Reza. & Subramanian, S. 2012, 'Students go click, flick and cheat... e-cheating, technologies and more', Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, vol. 6, no. N/A, pp. 1-26.
D. L. King and C. J. Case, “e-Cheating: Are Students Misusing It?,” Issues in Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 71–75, 2007.
P. Diptyana and L. Almilia, “The Perception of College Students Toward E-Cheating,” presented at the 8 th Annual SEAAIR Conference, 4-6 November 2008, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2008.
K. Mcmurtry, “e-cheating: Combating a 21st Century Challenge,” T.H.E. Journal: Transforming Education Through Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, 2001.
L. Z. Bain, “How Students Use Technology to Cheat and What Faculty Can Do About It,” in Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference, Baltimore, Maryland USA, 2014, vol. 31.
D. W. Bedford, J. D. Gregg, and M. S. Clinton, “Preventing Online Cheating with Technology: A Pilot Study of Remote Proctor and an Update of Its Use,” Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 41–58, 2011.
J. M. Stogner, B. L. Miller, and C. D. Marcum, “Learning to E-Cheat: A Criminological Test of Internet Facilitated Academic Cheating,” Journal of Criminal Justice Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175–199, 2013.
E. M. Anderman and T. B. Murdock, Eds., Psychology of Academic Cheating. Elsevier, 2007.
Abstract: The paper tries to answer the question – can IT tools help to solve e-cheating problem during the course of information technologies and computer sciences. The scale of e-cheating leads to the situation that dishonest students have better grades than honest ones. None of the simple solutions known from the literature helped to solve that problem, so IT tools were used. The first part of the paper gives a critical review of the literature of the subject. In the second one comparative analysis of results of the two surveys is performed. The first one was based on a survey conducted in United States, the second in Australia. This analysis shows that there are very big cultural differences in students’ attitude to cheating in different countries. The third part presents two software solutions of e-cheating problem investigated during research – monitoring software and safe exam browser. Final remarks are accompanied by raising an open question – will these IT solutions be valuable in the coming decade?
K. O. Jones, J. Reid, and R. Bartlett, “E-learning and E-cheating,” presented at the 3rd e-Learning Conference, Coimbra, Portugal, 2008.
Khan, Z. & Samuel, S. D. 2009, 'E-cheating, online sources and technologies: a critical review of existing literature', 9th Global conference of business and economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-15
Khan, Z. Reza. & Subramanian, S. 2012, 'Students go click, flick and cheat... e-cheating, technologies and more', Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, vol. 6, no. N/A, pp. 1-26.
D. L. King and C. J. Case, “e-Cheating: Are Students Misusing It?,” Issues in Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 71–75, 2007.
P. Diptyana and L. Almilia, “The Perception of College Students Toward E-Cheating,” presented at the 8 th Annual SEAAIR Conference, 4-6 November 2008, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2008.
K. Mcmurtry, “e-cheating: Combating a 21st Century Challenge,” T.H.E. Journal: Transforming Education Through Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, 2001.
L. Z. Bain, “How Students Use Technology to Cheat and What Faculty Can Do About It,” in Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference, Baltimore, Maryland USA, 2014, vol. 31.
D. W. Bedford, J. D. Gregg, and M. S. Clinton, “Preventing Online Cheating with Technology: A Pilot Study of Remote Proctor and an Update of Its Use,” Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 41–58, 2011.
J. M. Stogner, B. L. Miller, and C. D. Marcum, “Learning to E-Cheat: A Criminological Test of Internet Facilitated Academic Cheating,” Journal of Criminal Justice Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175–199, 2013.
E. M. Anderman and T. B. Murdock, Eds., Psychology of Academic Cheating. Elsevier, 2007.
Comments
Post a Comment